X2Go Bug report logs - #1439
latest release of x2goclient for Ubuntu has dependency on hello

version graph

Package: x2goclient; Maintainer for x2goclient is X2Go Developers <x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org>; Source for x2goclient is src:x2goclient.

Reported by: Seth Galitzer <sgsax@ksu.edu>

Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 22:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: not-a-bug

Found in version 4.1.2.2

Done: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Subject: Bug#1439: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#1439: Bug#1439: latest release of x2goclient for Ubuntu has dependency on hello
Reply-To: Ulrich Sibiller <uli42@gmx.de>, 1439@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-From: Ulrich Sibiller <uli42@gmx.de>
Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org
Resent-CC: X2Go Developers <x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:20:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.1439.B1439.158178718123435@bugs.x2go.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org
X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 1439
X-X2Go-PR-Package: x2goclient
X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: not-a-bug
References: <0c721641-0bc6-a233-3c2e-a3c5ecf27076@ionic.de> <74fab147-6aa0-5eb2-d490-c5384b3bedd2@ksu.edu> <CANVnVYLDtiGGAmtLEKtssAHX-K-hpXVq8wtZQXowRfrM6PTMZQ@mail.gmail.com> <682cd690-ce70-9ff0-8e31-e5f25ae0d8b6@ionic.de> <74fab147-6aa0-5eb2-d490-c5384b3bedd2@ksu.edu>
Received: via spool by 1439-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B1439.158178718123435
          (code B ref 1439); Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:20:02 +0000
Received: (at 1439) by bugs.x2go.org; 15 Feb 2020 17:19:41 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com (mail-ot1-f68.google.com [209.85.210.68])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45E45DAE9
	for <1439@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:19:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 66so12197280otd.9
        for <1439@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:19:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=dHkayHQRRWJCUVm69WGByx1zSSBel7z7QWEtL0YNNOg=;
        b=Ld1CkMyAlDoSHZd6xc1TDx0/vpHKUPy5J8kdMAcvUvNmXGUnGtVv4jmi34yzV31jiR
         BPtLXLdsbdwtVBzKizAFPU5wn2uLEMaDDtWIMzyxmwYXHIITzfb1+C2DOFSrWu9j2f7F
         v8KuaSAZlS4ns8zFzfOyA5cL4UeXjUtTTCMSc9jMas+iFmuVSfinjBeMg8Bwn6ztyJIn
         d0KSb1z4kYE/q7oUf2F5JdXdaNXSyAEX39y4IFvraRVVQbntd9aC0Z1QWYNvpjHDBoTp
         ANlOe5iBIr015q3nNEw3SwhK34i+u9Jpk79BXyXQixIX5opNM/Dy23dgb06Eb1QbNx+5
         52hA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXq5SHTLMcOfant6XDv8JJH8Y4vzZMm5+sIQ9xg+umv0RyYxfHO
	FsxV1vh1zAwX3PzBdastOEBgJp6+ReQxavw1zbw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPG2m7uZmN7YTcAOk7EXKi/zjvrienrpCirl7lzeeqlpTEdNJ64p8QA7pgK9vcGf0vt3oNL+au2DF5EwTJkyk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:dc1:: with SMTP id 59mr6602062ots.250.1581787174050;
 Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:19:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <682cd690-ce70-9ff0-8e31-e5f25ae0d8b6@ionic.de>
From: Ulrich Sibiller <uli42@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:19:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CANVnVYJ3E8meRM8J7yFBBoK0E6599OHm+tfcoHK-Um1GLuGD=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>, 1439@bugs.x2go.org
Cc: Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Ok, thanks for the clarification!

Uli

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 5:05 PM Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de> wrote:
>
> * On 2/15/20 4:23 PM, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
> > 1. why choose hello and not something that's on the system anyway,
> > like the kernel or bin-utils or some X package?
>
> I'm not a DD, so my answer isn't authoritative and Mike#1 can probably explain
> this better, but optionaldep | hello seems to be a very common pattern in Debian
> packaging. If a DD sees such a dependency, he'll recognize it and its meaning
> immediately.
>
> Depending on a package in the base system set (i.e., those marked "essential")
> MIGHT be easier, but this is seems to be generally frowned upon because it makes
> degrading essential-set packages to optional ones more difficult, if I recall
> correctly. I've also read that normal (i.e., optional, non-core/essential)
> packages should generally NOT depend upon packages in the essential-set but just
> assume them to available unconditionally.
>
>
> > 2. why do you want to mak x2gokdriveclient (or is it x2gokdrive?)  a
> > hard dependency? Nobody needs it unless he's wants to use it. People
> > can use x2go without it. So I see it as optional either way...
>
> Hm, Mike#1 wanted it to be a hard dependency, but moving it to Recommends might
> make sense after all, since other software that X2Go Client *can* make use of,
> like FreeRDP2, is also not strictly necessary and merely a recommended package.
>
> Note that Debian installs recommended packages by default (unless users
> explicitly configure or tell the package manager not to do this), so user
> experience wouldn't be affected by that change anyway.
>
>
>
> Mihai
>
> _______________________________________________
> x2go-dev mailing list
> x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org
> https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-dev

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.

X2Go Developers <owner@bugs.x2go.org>. Last modified: Thu Nov 21 18:38:31 2024; Machine Name: ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de

X2Go Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.