From siretart@gmail.com Wed Jan 9 16:32:08 2013 Received: (at 84) by bugs.x2go.org; 9 Jan 2013 15:32:08 +0000 Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com (mail-oa0-f41.google.com [209.85.219.41]) by ymir (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D275DB0A for <84@bugs.x2go.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:32:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so1113937oag.28 for <84@bugs.x2go.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:32:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FMfaWB5gHfQ9g1KwELCqNF1HU7Ou69O7+n4JJD8/PPY=; b=cZ1Lr1CG+4Yc3Y9IeDOxGmEK6BCJu7zYnGea+5vOlyhW6gcMaTjrhCeZG3MX1ND8gO gBgBnRtvljhCH9FerbnMmzsPKrG89YcOMrRIcBD0iIXhdBcdAa2cMPq2jb6qq6K/Erbt dzbS2/uf7ndJc3UUXUtTxDdRbqBswCCYknVLqc1NUbXExkX3c6rtmJNKq4f7zXXsm5bL ahXYLey3jwskb5rzz6hA/Q3Az8hPUyrsb24NSWO1QJfYKvb5F0gv9iq6WO2gx+FMFqCr ZM1/6AHwRZUq4c3PsQXLMEQt5G2qoB2VdyDDE1TySFEudQd64c+kRwMQ3sv7xXXqbGJn fBvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.92.70 with SMTP id ck6mr48823711obb.46.1357745526563; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:32:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.25.71 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:32:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130109010011.4f92023b@enterprise.cafarelli.fr> <20130109161041.118432fsrumy2jch@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:32:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#84: Hardcoded -O3 in CFLAGS From: Reinhard Tartler To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Mike Gabriel , 84@bugs.x2go.org, Bernard Cafarelli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Wednesday 2013-01-09 16:10, Mike Gabriel wrote: >> >> All kind of flags are hard-coded in linux.cf in nx-X11/cf/ (I think). You may >> know imake better then I do. If you could take another look at it, that would >> be awesome. >> >> Note: LDFLAGS appear to be named LDOPTIONS in nx-X11. >> >> Note, that nxcomp, nxcompshad and nxcompext are configured and built from >> within nx-X11/programs/Xserver/Makefile.in (IIRC, might be the Makfile.in one >> level up). So the nx* builds are prepared by imake. I guess the only way to >> address it is to teach imake to let through *FLAGS. >> >> The nx-X11 build process is a bummer..., I agree with that. Any help and >> improvement is really appreciated. > > Can we split nxcomp, nxcompshad, nxcompext and nxproxy into > separate tarballs in any way? > After all, they are "just" addons to an existing (X11|nx-libs) tree > that gets installed as well and which looks usable. That's what I have initially implemented. This was reverted because it caused strange segfaults nobody had the capacity to fully analyze. Mike can fill in the details. -- regards, Reinhard