From nable.maininbox@googlemail.com Sat Jun 22 19:09:11 2013 Received: (at 241) by bugs.x2go.org; 22 Jun 2013 17:09:11 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com (mail-bk0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by ymir (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B9693BDED for <241@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-bk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ji1so3729654bkc.24 for <241@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:09:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tzFQcwqi3DvkhVigdJI8aNsqgJfwciCHWXygme7s90E=; b=mOhA5CNP6ncqfgsTxAfr2mYNEjhU0sdN/GGunKG9x0u20m7xTTx/0Gfupqp2ZV7+tQ Y8vWqH4LDRzs8/UqJuCVP6O9+CfjK3WeGOIfymrfSkMjd1d2CN0c6b7JQkMldVuCmUiQ j1c1j4IplMiXadPK0A8tlZ1T3l2WOeitnlppdF7jLNSpKIFZVEkBGOW9Qg6i6acXpIoF oLBJaIP7WyIgMU8rt65bZOuORZHbsFdqBBi8wkRZQj/g3o547frKbHsFRtGuErrrhNR/ qzxYlyxSBB45eUfxc0e+Jrd4DvfBHiV5scdrg8gWANW7B5deYnlXsRPEMJ4lTszIs+yI tplA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.4.132 with SMTP id oc4mr2592721bkb.171.1371920951086; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.235.194 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:09:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1371911686-15060-1-git-send-email-xypron.glpk@gmx.de> References: <20130621102049.28992mah70gw8xr5@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <1371911686-15060-1-git-send-email-xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 21:09:11 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#241: [PATCH 22/22] Re: Bug#241: Changed host key cannot be updated From: Nable 80 To: xypron.glpk@gmx.de, 241@bugs.x2go.org, x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > + if ( !QMessageBox::warning( 0, tr( "Host key verification failed" ), > + errMsg, tr( "Yes" ), tr( "No" ) ) != 0) I think that using `!' in the beginning and `!=' in the end is a great idea to confuse everybody, including those who have written this piece of code. Or did I understood these lines in a wrong way (here is some irony) ?