From mikedep333@gmail.com Thu Jul 17 15:28:04 2014 Received: (at 462) by bugs.x2go.org; 17 Jul 2014 13:28:05 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D405DB2C for <462@bugs.x2go.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:28:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id p10so3008724wes.16 for <462@bugs.x2go.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 06:28:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YxJXbHNxglw/8yYdrN6xNdVGEHfbT/9P1oFaIZmHdIM=; b=hiV5eFzPSMK4aHg2QgJOrdEnRUdu8AH5tPECnshfOdQrxYWNK+4GXHH0ksu7Pr5mx9 v6zGj9TZRlTfl+jXYuqmKU0vKnU8KFCt5J+WZQSMqVRK+a4ilHZjncqxapysvFtd6vti sKWneSs1px8MrZCFg25kk7WG8e775Gz+2B7iIAk0WPVfGxZBGi7PAEECehNt5GsTmy6N vlm3WQl1aP+VNIzySbSMSUiJ3YjbHG9P5pCu0RBfyJL7uzkyBHwpK3wCeShp+0qpcxdK pMCJn4EGOGNOv5c+ThMhRrZa6oO3qT5Jrbxc+WmOn4dSlp2Qk8RGqKk6yB14lkIb7V5P p4iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.158.164 with SMTP id wv4mr4122211wjb.124.1405603683450; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 06:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.98.233 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 06:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 09:28:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Needs more info From: Michael DePaulo To: 462@bugs.x2go.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Jim, Sorry to hear that you ran into this bug. We need more info though. Please tell us: 1. You say "It tries to maximize, but simply performs a maximize on that display." What do you mean by this? See bug 551 for what I experienced, I have a screenshot. If you are experiencing a different problem, please provide a screenshot if you can. 2. What are the details of your system and monitors? See bug #551 for the details I provided. 3. What exact settings do you have set for the sesion? See bug #551 for the details I provided. Note that I filed bug #551, rather than replying to this bug report, because I wasn't sure if it was the same bug or not. -Mike#2