From unknown Thu Mar 28 18:04:21 2024 X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Bug#699: epel 5 repos have signature errors Reply-To: Michael DePaulo , 699@bugs.x2go.org Resent-From: Michael DePaulo Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org Resent-CC: X2Go Developers X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-X2Go-PR-Message: report 699 X-X2Go-PR-Package: buildscripts X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B.141839415229284 (code B); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:25:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.x2go.org; 12 Dec 2014 14:22:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B91D5E0F0 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:22:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b13so9206111wgh.32 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:22:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/F36JCYAKXzsuEsCYsACS4AvUF0gSfMOmi2fT7zObWs=; b=tKwQWNM8yI1lakfcfXh0ObJKWl0eLthxN4QaRBsk7ZNgbpl83KUMlcNA69lQbaFybU QkzzQsvgQTjUJDyQDIHqThmXF8q1IS1QU2UkEt+DXyzHabEgqUui9G+gZbH9Dwa6XCvD 31whSGlW4MtfEQtOvnZyCMhke/N7ONYrmpvEWxOH1xMep2xIC/iVKugvtWrM0uNLdyyL qbv0LUt5niuMJ6k/wj18VBYNDgX7kHkF5Jpv0GxWShCgIr4Xqxh8iKnW4M5xUd/I4juV YmUr8eP5sNnpCBUGlDogQhcycPr4WrXEVwU2UTUBRmdewU+YADTcEw4AqHd5XqmVte/r OSOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.6.199 with SMTP id d7mr27719905wja.124.1418394150672; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.20.226 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:22:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:22:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael DePaulo To: submit@bugs.x2go.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Package: buildscripts Severity: normal As reported here: http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/2014-December/002705.html A CentOS 5 user is getting these errors: error: nx-libs-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e error: libXcomp-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e etc.... The cause appears to be that CentOS 5 cannot handle V4 signatures, only V3. http://adminotes.blogspot.fr/2011/12/centos-6-rpm-sign-problem-v4-signatures.html From unknown Thu Mar 28 18:04:21 2024 X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Bug#699: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#699: epel 5 repos have signature errors Reply-To: Mike Gabriel , 699@bugs.x2go.org Resent-From: Mike Gabriel Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org Resent-CC: X2Go Developers X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 699 X-X2Go-PR-Package: buildscripts X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 699-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B699.141843709028951 (code B ref 699); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 699) by bugs.x2go.org; 13 Dec 2014 02:18:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from freya.das-netzwerkteam.de (freya.das-netzwerkteam.de [88.198.48.199]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B06E5E0F6 for <699@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:18:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de [78.46.204.98]) by freya.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB0912D7C; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:18:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103303CE96; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:18:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhUxhWMiW-q8; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:18:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2BC3BD04; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 03:18:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from p5B3B8556.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p5B3B8556.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.59.133.86]) by mail.das-netzwerkteam.de (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:18:07 +0000 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:18:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20141213021807.Horde.qt4g9BzprQnt6C9m6xY1mA7@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> From: Mike Gabriel To: Michael DePaulo , 699@bugs.x2go.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.2.2) Accept-Language: en,de Organization: DAS-NETZWERKTEAM X-Originating-IP: 91.59.133.86 X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 Iceweasel/32.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_ehVZbDABCwXSBuKYTgM3xg1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_ehVZbDABCwXSBuKYTgM3xg1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Control: tag -1 pending Hi Michael, On Fr 12 Dez 2014 15:22:30 CET, Michael DePaulo wrote: > As reported here: > > http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/2014-December/002705.html > > A CentOS 5 user is getting these errors: > > error: nx-libs-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: Heade= r V4 > RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e > error: libXcomp-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos:=20= =20 >=20Header V4 > RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e > etc.... > > The cause appears to be that CentOS 5 cannot handle V4 signatures, only V= 3. > http://adminotes.blogspot.fr/2011/12/centos-6-rpm-sign-problem-v4-signatu= res.html I hope this (and a previous commit) fixes the issue: http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=3Dbuildscripts.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D3c79b61= da0e25e7df61206d0d6ac986e457ff7af I have just triggered rebuilds of nightly packages nx-libs and=20=20 x2goserver.=20Can you check (once the have built) if those packages are=20= =20 now=20installable on Centos5? Thanks, Mike --=20 DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike=20gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.x= fb --=_ehVZbDABCwXSBuKYTgM3xg1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUi6HfAAoJEJr0azAldxsxnHEP/3TRFsunPiHkTEUnSz5yn/Vj Zw3EeVQbGsxpNofaHLFsDu5pvdWjCGZ3n+jPNSiMeGHz0w36HrbBoH199nY2VfVo tQxfbhYp+Ok7THRqdpFvF6ntWnk2DS4EI80y7/0/kAu02ebUo3LmDBpnbdInAoYw WkETy3goRQrBJOW+JwBlmJnTxxeCjS9FXqaAPTY0Nw+E7SGWX1YLdMDAB8RMSQ0D 8BOO4Zu+h1NNLt8A4hRkmQfeovM8Q4CptnV+CXJnJd6pdD2C+YJukCZ/KTntwIv6 sMQuRP9EgQaNhpmXbeWJBD0JkF72g9NZ+o9syS1gIcYMwmP9KFiW91VOGgdVZhlG 0GqLGwicvTZq8u5YmIx53BlbZDi3gtFm2kZPF/jrDcc5XUQ2/kAKJNUCwKbbA19S 81XfE5ox3r86/yDWJNS0UsFnIwOK2rEbnsGriBfCojBfsR3evDFsKHGhXLxBomRA e9NjlN3+m6OKushTDLAUmbSXoUk6RUqvTqt16QDjUKuFqKZBEVISKV9Zb7bYXRwm Tdc3OL0IMwlwxk2SBPZ3iEx6E0vhYO2cqKkJ3vxN4+e5hwTGArExRNtEKXC7TIoj z7DNswS/P5SF7X2FVJCqU9O9SrJXGEziTdkmDNXrDwnCDghuBYjrpujevBqRpISZ 0ea0+U7oaF2EpRQ8Wp/R =G5Ub -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_ehVZbDABCwXSBuKYTgM3xg1-- From unknown Thu Mar 28 18:04:21 2024 X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Bug#699: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#699: epel 5 repos have signature errors Reply-To: Michael DePaulo , 699@bugs.x2go.org Resent-From: Michael DePaulo Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org Resent-CC: X2Go Developers X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 699 X-X2Go-PR-Package: buildscripts X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: pending Received: via spool by 699-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B699.14185065353727 (code B ref 699); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 699) by bugs.x2go.org; 13 Dec 2014 21:35:35 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A475F5DB1C for <699@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 22:35:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so5691759wiv.1 for <699@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:35:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OIwCgfJZ8r1a/oKXbWtRPeeBy68llHv9swWMJYMBco4=; b=r86itcmsmqAWvQcpM4lNHjEHXZ2MA30uclnVudbaxdgzADkngCxTfRmiyq1/OJaXM7 WUOmOROt8YteGEaUStEg36Mvq3VxltWKoY2XQCa6TXOZe8V6YeqLQEo5ol5OxEXP8doU ikNxrIo/gnZtZGH6n8tObs63ez6ODEGHOnagUmVZ3OIhaWg8aX7HW90aWP5fdoSEwetz 7SycM1psisUOrqeNO8c66pPB5A0VPAbwi4wE/uw4P6QCriRkWK+OsxDf7MgR60DJtMjQ CwZbmibLD8sS5GmM4E6SWrEzyUVgU5Ufn2ElUKYtyalhWudyhI4rql2YseHP4jjZeE9Z jDRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.121.167 with SMTP id ll7mr35449432wjb.26.1418479854176; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 06:10:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.20.226 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 06:10:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141213021807.Horde.qt4g9BzprQnt6C9m6xY1mA7@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> References: <20141213021807.Horde.qt4g9BzprQnt6C9m6xY1mA7@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:10:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael DePaulo To: Mike Gabriel Cc: 699@bugs.x2go.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Hi Michael, > > On Fr 12 Dez 2014 15:22:30 CET, Michael DePaulo wrote: > >> As reported here: >> >> http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/2014-December/002705.html >> >> A CentOS 5 user is getting these errors: >> >> error: nx-libs-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: Header >> V4 >> RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e >> error: libXcomp-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: >> Header V4 >> RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e >> etc.... >> >> The cause appears to be that CentOS 5 cannot handle V4 signatures, only >> V3. >> >> http://adminotes.blogspot.fr/2011/12/centos-6-rpm-sign-problem-v4-signatures.html > > > I hope this (and a previous commit) fixes the issue: > http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=buildscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c79b61da0e25e7df61206d0d6ac986e457ff7af > > > I have just triggered rebuilds of nightly packages nx-libs and x2goserver. > Can you check (once the have built) if those packages are now installable on > Centos5? > > Thanks, > Mike Hi Mike#1, I just setup a CentOS 5.11 64-bit VM and tried to install the nightly packages. I am still getting the errors like both Michael Dubois and I get with the stable release packages. error: nx-libs-3.5.0.29-0.0x2go1.0.git20141213.552.heuler.el5.centos: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e -Mike#2 From unknown Thu Mar 28 18:04:21 2024 X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Bug#699: Fix committed, but only the nightly repo is fixed yet Reply-To: Michael DePaulo , 699@bugs.x2go.org Resent-From: Michael DePaulo Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org Resent-CC: X2Go Developers X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 04:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 699 X-X2Go-PR-Package: buildscripts X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: pending Received: via spool by 699-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B699.141922301329833 (code B ref 699); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 04:40:01 +0000 Received: (at 699) by bugs.x2go.org; 22 Dec 2014 04:36:53 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A5F5DB35 for <699@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 05:36:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ex7so6823947wid.0 for <699@bugs.x2go.org>; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 20:36:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0xKxLnD6HVh2ZkHHg6m931QkLf3r03tbu36S6XKkP2Q=; b=Eb06RckUVqAnBIBhEPad0Z49wSc1zzta5d+IDkV4ETwV2En9NOHCjsB2F7dWpBVVGH HPV5/EoC0JAumRswftZMZgsgKHlPuW6MjkKXmUK5mNRgCn9DMWNpZY/8O6lC+9DdYhs8 eJUH9S4qRZ7qhUp14zIA/kFY9in08qCjGKJXpJ3oE1LUp9KJvqVLV94o8SllSHrA0Bht 8X85vnwTW0+ImGdmyO2BZHGGNsKHn2xoKXfbZeUhjnD9cHWu7qsOvUcAebFzn6E+YFOM FBzoe9fhOWz+9OAcvXf9Rw7oM8NkK6WB5sSLOP6ELvBSRctTSPioYEl+mvf8jeCdQvvj pwOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.6.199 with SMTP id d7mr37654851wja.124.1419223010531; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 20:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.20.226 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 20:36:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 23:36:50 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael DePaulo To: 699@bugs.x2go.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d43a6665fe8050ac69b5c --047d7b5d43a6665fe8050ac69b5c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I committed the fix to buildscripts.git and updated buildscripts.git on japsand.x2go.org (which builds & uploads the packages.) However, for reasons explained in the linked email, I have only rebuilt the "nightly" packages with the key, not the "main" (stable release) packages yet. And the 4.1.0.0 x2goserver nightly package is very unstable. http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-dev/2014-December/008891.html To any users affected by this bug, I hope to have the main packages rebuilt (and therefore fixed) ASAP. --047d7b5d43a6665fe8050ac69b5c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I committed the fix to buildscripts.git and updated builds= cripts.git on japsand.x2go.org (whi= ch builds & uploads the packages.)

However, for reas= ons explained in the linked email, I have only rebuilt the "nightly&qu= ot; packages with the key, not the "main" (stable release) packag= es yet. And the 4.1.0.0 x2goserver nightly package is very unstable.
<= div>http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-dev/2014-December/008891.html<= /a>

--047d7b5d43a6665fe8050ac69b5c-- From unknown Thu Mar 28 18:04:21 2024 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.502 (Entity 5.502) X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org From: owner@bugs.x2go.org (X2Go Bug Tracking System) To: Michael DePaulo Subject: Bug#699 closed by Michael DePaulo (I fixed this bug, but now #714 is a problem) Message-ID: References: X-X2go-PR-Message: they-closed 699 X-X2go-PR-Package: buildscripts Reply-To: 699@bugs.x2go.org Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:05:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1420301102-20161-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1420301102-20161-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the buildscripts package: #699: epel 5 repos have signature errors It has been closed by Michael DePaulo . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Michael DePaulo by replying to this email. --=20 699: http://bugs.x2go.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D699 X2Go Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.x2go.org with problems ------------=_1420301102-20161-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 699-done) by bugs.x2go.org; 3 Jan 2015 16:04:46 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56ACD5DA2C for <699-done@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 17:04:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so954111wiv.7 for <699-done@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 08:04:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mq7DTXOsFMaAf6IsIttJ7AOPaP89o7ejWhxyc2Tu/F4=; b=qhLFklFugpQujLedaQe1BYNbuMO6MzXd4r8bGRjiXlZ2VAQEPlVLdDhc7BLNlA4twt sFhWksyuKxurJrXyPQOlkJhN/MENCO6zeBoUSCTkFiTy2Iif9cYCRXejHCbDTW5+Rrwr cCGt5+tQFSyOMZNn1toUDtotb2bYi4Q4EhsnZNDYDCA0BTFuxxwp8XLWnnNvdIpsEoOU kHU9mnzXh013UH5Ve4OlPnHykrbb2e+WMYUIctX3FeBat5GD5OxgSvTFi/TvxZVSgVA3 NY8/9npAHAQt2PcLYyqyvGXcbyj4fFVbm8IoJPWED7IPP9fZi0RyMS+iH14aWczwe4wi 97sg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.109.9 with SMTP id ho9mr41903454wjb.29.1420301085013; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 08:04:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.90.116 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 08:04:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:04:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: I fixed this bug, but now #714 is a problem From: Michael DePaulo To: 699-done@bugs.x2go.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I fixed this bug in buildscript.git via commit 1c1553a . Per the advise of MIke#1, I then rebuilt the EPEL5 packages only by running commands like the following on japsand.x2go.org as x2go-admin: NO_DELAY=yes FORCE_BUILD=yes RPM_BUILD_FOR="epel:5" x2go-build+upload-rpm-package nx-libs main (I had to run "git pull" under ~x2go-admin/buildscripts/ 1st.) I tested the fix successfully. The fixed packages have version strings like the following: 4.0.1.18-0.0x2go1.1.git20150103.949.main.el5.centos However, I discovered bug #714 along the way. So X2Go Server's support for epel 5 is still broken :( ------------=_1420301102-20161-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.x2go.org; 12 Dec 2014 14:22:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B91D5E0F0 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:22:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b13so9206111wgh.32 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:22:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/F36JCYAKXzsuEsCYsACS4AvUF0gSfMOmi2fT7zObWs=; b=tKwQWNM8yI1lakfcfXh0ObJKWl0eLthxN4QaRBsk7ZNgbpl83KUMlcNA69lQbaFybU QkzzQsvgQTjUJDyQDIHqThmXF8q1IS1QU2UkEt+DXyzHabEgqUui9G+gZbH9Dwa6XCvD 31whSGlW4MtfEQtOvnZyCMhke/N7ONYrmpvEWxOH1xMep2xIC/iVKugvtWrM0uNLdyyL qbv0LUt5niuMJ6k/wj18VBYNDgX7kHkF5Jpv0GxWShCgIr4Xqxh8iKnW4M5xUd/I4juV YmUr8eP5sNnpCBUGlDogQhcycPr4WrXEVwU2UTUBRmdewU+YADTcEw4AqHd5XqmVte/r OSOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.6.199 with SMTP id d7mr27719905wja.124.1418394150672; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.20.226 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:22:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:22:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: epel 5 repos have signature errors From: Michael DePaulo To: submit@bugs.x2go.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Package: buildscripts Severity: normal As reported here: http://lists.x2go.org/pipermail/x2go-user/2014-December/002705.html A CentOS 5 user is getting these errors: error: nx-libs-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e error: libXcomp-3.5.0.28-0.0x2go1.1.git20141114.546.main.el5.centos: Header V4 RSA/SHA1 signature: BAD, key ID 5bfe2b6e etc.... The cause appears to be that CentOS 5 cannot handle V4 signatures, only V3. http://adminotes.blogspot.fr/2011/12/centos-6-rpm-sign-problem-v4-signatures.html ------------=_1420301102-20161-1--