From ionic@ionic.de Thu Jul 2 02:39:06 2015 Received: (at 899) by bugs.x2go.org; 2 Jul 2015 00:39:08 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from Root24.de (powered.by.root24.eu [5.135.3.88]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED44D5DA86 for <899@bugs.x2go.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:39:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nopileos.local (home.ionic.de [217.92.117.31]) by mail.ionic.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82CD94F0506B; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:39:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ionic.de; s=default; t=1435797545; bh=kBG6iqUSvmeujn54QK/LETSXe2l6Osfr635FqTlxsNs=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mZ/m8eXkquXfgFtb+7b3OiDL28HgiDi0AuVvvjambD0qrcUYEm1UrNCwLzOyhWthT yLqJosdIVQ2K5nAELowt3YkNLTv7GZq2j+ry5UXeO3N6MW6FalyWbd7Oy3qBTsM6IO v1c00pyxGMhyU6aQcb4jlHrMhMBLVMFexRo4z/xA= Subject: Re: [X2Go-Dev] EPEL 6 8 Jul 2015 release has dependency error To: "Harris, Peter A" , "899@bugs.x2go.org" <899@bugs.x2go.org> References: <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BC44B@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> <5593281F.9010702@ionic.de> <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BD1B3@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> <55940EF1.4080604@ionic.de> <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BD29B@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> <55942394.2080409@ionic.de> <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BD51B@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> <55944F87.8080405@ionic.de> <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BDA01@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> <55947645.7000302@ionic.de> <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BDB48@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> From: Mihai Moldovan X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55948823.9060608@ionic.de> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:38:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6C81244C2F3FDF44A51853E4D3BEA2EF945BDB48@US-BV-EXM01-P.global.tektronix.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="F6pHCJJdKKGsBavdPrQi2KmHKmIFlcscL" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --F6pHCJJdKKGsBavdPrQi2KmHKmIFlcscL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02.07.2015 02:24 AM, Harris, Peter A wrote: > [PAH-TEST-134-62-62] > x2go-release-epel> ls > 3622fd378b433fadfe2447d160f0503c8e55fb6508403c2f5812332055ea7021-other.= sqlite cachecookie > 3b4d858dc9502dd70495a7478354dda38d1b5920981e1e763b6b3d4cc479b215-fileli= sts.sqlite packages > 3e2ca432eee448392bed25e4ace4fc5cc5bd7c9c03ba52235a6350e3c0fe6d3d-primar= y.sqlite repomd.xml What happens if you open that with sqlite3 and use the SELECT query I've = provided earlier? SELECT * FROM `packages` WHERE name=3D'libXcompshad3'; I've that's indeed also giving back libXcompshad3 output (description and= other metadata)... I'm lost. > [PAH-TEST-134-62-62] > x2go-release-epel> sha512sum 3e2ca432eee448392bed25e4ace4fc5cc5bd7c9c0= 3ba52235a6350e3c0fe6d3d-primary.sqlite=20 > f499aed1fe3fb84e786e7bccceb663dbadf11191ba6dc6d612a260ec34764f52f74d126= fdefb05d49d8df34e44f1150f8bbc40254eef7d27fcbbf8c574fe0b57 3e2ca432eee448= 392bed25e4ace4fc5cc5bd7c9c03ba52235a6350e3c0fe6d3d-primary.sqlite My checksums match yours. Crap. There goes this theory. > And the install still fails as before. >=20 > Next I used yumdownloader to download x2goserver and all its dependenci= es (except libXcompshad3 which it cannot see). I then used sha512sum to = compare those files with the ones that came down through rsync. Since th= e rsync is not tunneled it may be no different than http download as far = as any firewall is concerned, if indeed they are doing any virus checking= =2E I have had no problems with RedHat or Epel. Anyway, the sums for al= l but perl-Capture-Tiny were the same. Has that changed since June 30 22= :30 UTC? I think so, some extra packages were not signed at all. I did that manual= ly as described in my wall of text eMail. As adding a signature naturally= changes an RPM, there's nothing to worry about. This said, I will have to re-sign all packages because the current method= isn't... consistent (using two different keys for packages and repo data= =2E) Mihai --F6pHCJJdKKGsBavdPrQi2KmHKmIFlcscL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVlIgkAAoJEB/WLtluJTqHxMAP/07SpVoyVATMizJsfMiTMISK uRm8GnM/kBLwDrISh2KkHm//F+12M2wlPOD794jpvA6pCO5DVRCTEQexMemMTZrq Sj1AGa5XNPm9TUJc56lJM/C1b1HZ0RuVDGyuGHCwGftnhjbPCHemlUWCzTMA7IAw 4v2HFCRalJnr68F0PqIz3pmINf7ZMX/xos8dvsf+GL78P9X2OtAx9e0E20Z9ZL8I 4eas9Bm0bSFxISF+FjITLDENWQbGdId2OTkCbpFsnAcKaML1A4rli9QJzqzfEImf AP+y3jP+POIdBChOLcSxOXbgPcjSzw8QOW4ZAH3WuZ9MN8BDb+s0vY2OYfe3p63G ARBOfNcmFp2jyt2cx9NCAL8gGFr6jPFJowCrgPbhNOqu1rKUQos2KCK8mjMAtVEN uyHCy8HxivXfT1yMVOY+U8jBaoMyEQZXq1Mdfd8GPeoBrBkQipHTjHkOq7U/tlxz bWBPX/wMe7gkJr9oCm/rp0aAWsHDOqXSqwsXBPoNKUCrEdApBhzORwOAdp6zVRxA /GSgo3eLPwkgLxR+7DFBZDpMWEjApe2msudloYWrbgfFqn+XOTeZj/fgPxrPVKVK r20ac0MGt+jf7HBmk+c5P/U0suM2pjjhQf7l6GX/jQTlI8pwyTEMg5iyaDxqL+LT Oyk6dDnG72LyRji3yDtN =Zv1l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F6pHCJJdKKGsBavdPrQi2KmHKmIFlcscL--