From ionic@ionic.de Tue Mar 3 14:11:13 2015 Received: (at 799) by bugs.x2go.org; 3 Mar 2015 13:11:14 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_DKIM_INVALID, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from Root24.de (powered.by.root24.eu [5.135.3.88]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BAD5DCA8 for <799@bugs.x2go.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:11:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from nopileos.local (home.ionic.de [217.92.117.31]) by mail.ionic.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B75D74F084C5; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:11:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ionic.de; s=default; t=1425388273; bh=Z+ZnDRoDPRj+VHqkqI8I1hlVoffkRtNyeXXWo5ktj6o=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KgHxkN+gNjbfNzHJv4Cu7194GhKw6+Bksb5+5HUXOipR3t9J461ESsiJRbXCLhAyF DHeYqyVsPurtbNWBJVpzA4oPHVEgWUY1jz4jL2LhIrCTwgz5FBFp2KqMh9EYEzxJBU Ei6rYigU4Zdu7xz0RveQa0AQfeHXK+MO0FmYthXk= Message-ID: <54F5B2E7.9080903@ionic.de> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100 From: Mihai Moldovan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anatoly Smaznov , 799@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Re: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#799: x2golistdesktops returns nothing References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KOwrGR9w9MLKKmw3tVFLwuctBEDCSDxDK" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KOwrGR9w9MLKKmw3tVFLwuctBEDCSDxDK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Anatoly On 01.03.2015 10:31 AM, Anatoly Smaznov wrote: > I'm using x2go on Arch linux x86_64. This package > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/x2goserver/ > I can't use desktop sharing - client says that no local desktop found. > After digging I found that `ss -lxu` returns nothing on my system. > Replace with `ss -x` and it works now. This sounds like a bug in ss. Does ss -xu also return nothing? What about ss -l -x -u? Mihai --KOwrGR9w9MLKKmw3tVFLwuctBEDCSDxDK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU9bLtAAoJEB/WLtluJTqHTOwQAI6ogFDB5lC0NjkdYI3iQ048 3W0eF9sHzfXnVk3t/RjGRVg9yVOOHOfQIoTbTIWp1/LRLqmj/RIZfYacqjLbbbz7 ob9fJDKijEKqphcnPYdFAxuWrIPKWldsGsCKjb0zPagZjhoxObj+vTFCLO3c+zBA nSh785eUGoSWS4QD+uKD+9dl8fPZVQHW0PcWX6o7zI6Yz8duIxEVkaDzhqLFtCUC jCSr5MIS+2Qav3YV4GN0t6eVykgRvlSxkSnkMzoSXAD+C3vnKlabw8HrmiEa/o1h 80Y92NXAP3RDPhj53UxPUC52BoxEqnMx4m2dh9hpDoSxxsgs4cSHV3aCKvpiHPW7 xFtRI9U2xFbdLYttWrcmF0+wWd2qofh9azMoWSLO1ZIBuruKvpaCiTMmZOuJipwD FLnX1H278R9fuxCbM0K5zxNOGUbeBWoq1MV6zGTxgFZHJzh3P+SaqYVaCQuRWmfu s0w5GQMaSYL38LuHVAo+l7iCBSY0oPGFlo2Fub2WI4SmigGPDUZJdvMnF1aJIRA4 GjDyY7INN1eZkHBQNlBBFaZZHmmAbay1Cd/LXBVn7PH9nf/GmOyOfiqRzUPg4fcy ty6obMDsTTadvTkUixRTAlSRqLXw8K6GJrsTsS41ggjCuMwKJVfAfzVGZNZvtkqT /aCYQJkUkEuDmNwgEqTK =qUaj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KOwrGR9w9MLKKmw3tVFLwuctBEDCSDxDK--