From unknown Tue May 26 12:10:11 2026
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Subject: Bug#799: [X2Go-Dev] x2golistdesktops - ss options
Reply-To: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>, 799@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>
Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org
Resent-CC: X2Go Developers <x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:45:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.799.B799.147879250031527@bugs.x2go.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org
X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 799
X-X2Go-PR-Package: x2goserver
X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 799-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B799.147879250031527
          (code B ref 799); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:45:01 +0000
Received: (at 799) by bugs.x2go.org; 10 Nov 2016 15:41:40 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC093CBB6
	for <799@bugs.x2go.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:41:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
Received: from ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id O1tKtRVUsJ16 for <799@bugs.x2go.org>;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:41:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Root24.de (powered.by.root24.eu [5.135.3.88])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24713CBB5
	for <799@bugs.x2go.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:41:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from nopileos.eduroam.hnu.uas (unknown [194.95.21.122])
	by mail.ionic.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8953B4F00651;
	Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:41:30 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ionic.de; s=default;
	t=1478792490; bh=4LZa4/8rFRQks5APFiNTjfBujuQ8omq22ExRHPz+oNI=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=bVvuaLRbkLqzx89RvrrsMNJUVQyShBXOc/mHGBNnKWgPTW19R/GzPktQn+H7BP8e9
	 WAW2ceDHJkUO6PJJ73HnX9NLbCz/ERzWSLWQM/rEEmqDOhNVzc3Jet4LSooFCLNoGK
	 x3KQOTMX/nfZFqBagNoddaA6i0B4qO1lxhIcmSdQ=
To: Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com>, 799@bugs.x2go.org
References: <78b50c98-b003-7f16-52b0-dcfe9d2f6fdd@cora.nwra.com>
From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>
Message-ID: <ef083f4e-eb37-aaa2-acf7-9eab080c6f74@ionic.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:41:29 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <78b50c98-b003-7f16-52b0-dcfe9d2f6fdd@cora.nwra.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="a3m9iHoBxwS5I3B8QWAXDMBlea3Au067D"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--a3m9iHoBxwS5I3B8QWAXDMBlea3Au067D
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="D8Vth0vmQ6UX5jcGXQmoGCeVIKm0n3N3W";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>
To: Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com>, 799@bugs.x2go.org
Message-ID: <ef083f4e-eb37-aaa2-acf7-9eab080c6f74@ionic.de>
Subject: Re: [X2Go-Dev] x2golistdesktops - ss options
References: <78b50c98-b003-7f16-52b0-dcfe9d2f6fdd@cora.nwra.com>
In-Reply-To: <78b50c98-b003-7f16-52b0-dcfe9d2f6fdd@cora.nwra.com>

--D8Vth0vmQ6UX5jcGXQmoGCeVIKm0n3N3W
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 22.09.2016 05:43 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> However, why is -u being passed to ss in the first place?  We're doing:=

>=20
> my $lines=3Dsystem_capture_stdout_output("ss", "-lxu");
> my @lines=3Dsplit("\n", "$lines");
> my @outp =3D grep ( /(@| )\/tmp\/.X11-unix\/X.*/, @lines);
> for(my $i=3D0;$i<@outp;$i++)
> {
> ...
>=20
> so we're filtering the output of ss for lines that look like unix=20
> sockets (/tmp/.X11-unix/X*), so -lx is appropriate.  But why use '-u' t=
o=20
> show UDP sockets?  No X server that I know of listens on UDP

The only thing that comes to my mind would be XMDCP, but ...

> and we certainly would filter it out anyway.

given this, it doesn't even make sense to keep this option.



Mihai


--D8Vth0vmQ6UX5jcGXQmoGCeVIKm0n3N3W--

--a3m9iHoBxwS5I3B8QWAXDMBlea3Au067D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=xwFo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a3m9iHoBxwS5I3B8QWAXDMBlea3Au067D--
