From unknown Tue May 26 12:10:11 2026
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Subject: Bug#799: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#799:  Bug#799: Same problem in Gentoo
Reply-To: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>, 799@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>
Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org
Resent-CC: X2Go Developers <x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:50:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.799.B799.143018913710169@bugs.x2go.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org
X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 799
X-X2Go-PR-Package: x2goserver
X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 799-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B799.143018913710169
          (code B ref 799); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:50:02 +0000
Received: (at 799) by bugs.x2go.org; 28 Apr 2015 02:45:37 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from Root24.de (powered.by.root24.eu [5.135.3.88])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846C75DA98
	for <799@bugs.x2go.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:45:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nopileos.local (home.ionic.de [217.92.117.31])
	by mail.ionic.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AB9E4F0904C;
	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ionic.de; s=default;
	t=1430189133; bh=Y5h5TtteL2cCCjkh/VKtHca480Iyg08jwU1Lutohvm0=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=Dh/D+wRvoc8ufWf+pefxXa7HtHr9mmm3BpeqdIpnuV5vP7KKb6uLd2B+kUGFGx9WX
	 WP8se5U7MyIey7ZzTKY92HVCObyDV3X3Mcoj7unVRKhcVrGrABlZqxpNwC6LLm4Y3m
	 SCXRDNKgsqCBMj8A3mvCE60zI6RjFoa2J5wHyhn8=
Message-ID: <553EF448.7020303@ionic.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:45:28 +0200
From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Cafarelli <voyageur@gentoo.org>, 799@bugs.x2go.org
References: <1e47dc1f09129eaf493dff52168b1df1@cafarelli.fr> <553E5310.3030706@ionic.de>
In-Reply-To: <553E5310.3030706@ionic.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="vXogua6PAiDJFgr9Br5QW5bLvNaNWtcWe"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--vXogua6PAiDJFgr9Br5QW5bLvNaNWtcWe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 27.04.2015 05:17 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> I'll have to create an upstream bug report for this. It's been on my to=
do list for the past few days...

Bug report "submitted": https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D143018447=
007958&w=3D2

Feel free to chime in there, please.



Mihai



--vXogua6PAiDJFgr9Br5QW5bLvNaNWtcWe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=q/Db
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vXogua6PAiDJFgr9Br5QW5bLvNaNWtcWe--
