From mikedep333@gmail.com  Sun Sep  7 04:04:10 2014
Received: (at 590) by bugs.x2go.org; 7 Sep 2014 02:04:11 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B660B5DEA7
	for <590@bugs.x2go.org>; Sun,  7 Sep 2014 04:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n12so2257034wgh.5
        for <590@bugs.x2go.org>; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Rlo11JGGexCWsbd/clDtKrDgAJWjGoJIoJry2hzLJSM=;
        b=vrbH7G9x7+i+5ALIrbqhwiCV5N9/jqsSAf2voFBXQjG76LNmVDgc62QZ51lvuNaXfw
         Y3yjcj9BkYHFr6CsyoLF9gpDj0wFJayzOFAb6c32wgFnkriC+02wwxLfzBo6Ykurcoav
         V2dRt/90+PCMt8U+FKlY8ohe7n+Vrp+xYqD9LqXBiXMw+L3FHGeojPb11Yb464r2l8hH
         yqLSX/BgiVb28Rx2T0yyqIZppq7+mCtXaC77pKaee0PCFBPHeO4zaHueR+r3UH1vK/X7
         cYJPb6l6hA8riBpdcbsLqyRFPrtCTCjgnQhp/zU0KwTS1VSJh3CZHQ3ZNS4kMnKGkmGS
         8dCQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.83.198 with SMTP id s6mr13187968wiy.83.1410055449476;
 Sat, 06 Sep 2014 19:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.238.66 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 19:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:04:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMKht8jE2Vt-nZ5PLkTZZN9ib0k8nGZaOS+6TAMOKyschOmZ3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Should libssh.dll be built with zlib support?
From: Michael DePaulo <mikedep333@gmail.com>
To: 590@bugs.x2go.org, Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Mike#1,

Should libssh.dll be built with zlib support? My 0.6.3 build is, while
Alex's 0.5.5 build is not.

-Mike