X2Go Bug report logs - #375
x2gothinclient does not install 686 kernel

version graph

Package: x2gothinclientmanagement; Maintainer for x2gothinclientmanagement is X2Go Developers <x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org>; Source for x2gothinclientmanagement is src:x2gothinclient.

Reported by: Anders Bruun Olsen <abo@dsl.dk>

Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:33:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 1.1.0.1

Full log


🔗 View this message in rfc822 format

X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Subject: Bug#375: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#375: x2gothinclient does not install 686 kernel
Reply-To: stephan.wagner@itos-gmbh.com, 375@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-From: Stephan Wagner <stephan.wagner@itos-gmbh.com>
Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de
Resent-CC: owner@bugs.x2go.org
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:33:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.375.B375.138728329812276@bugs.x2go.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org
X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 375
X-X2Go-PR-Package: x2gothinclientmanagement
X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: moreinfo
Received: via spool by 375-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B375.138728329812276
          (code B ref 375); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:33:02 +0000
Received: (at 375) by bugs.x2go.org; 17 Dec 2013 12:28:18 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Greylist: delayed 583 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at ymir; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:28:17 CET
Received: from mail.itos-gmbh.com (mail.itos-gmbh.com [188.40.99.228])
	by ymir (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A89985DB16
	for <375@bugs.x2go.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:28:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.itos-gmbh.com (adsl-89-217-5-40.adslplus.ch [89.217.5.40])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.itos-gmbh.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0743D534D1;
	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:18:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Stephan Wagner <stephan.wagner@itos-gmbh.com>
Organization: ITos GmbH
To: Mike Gabriel <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de>,
 375@bugs.x2go.org,
 x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:18:31 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAFJm-UPbmJ-SqUSaE+VTOzsXR38pwoVCjbFXsPfhepWNXM3uBg@mail.gmail.com> <20131217112430.Horde.LR9FJpJqwhCoWPI1HhdULA7@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131217112430.Horde.LR9FJpJqwhCoWPI1HhdULA7@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de>
X-KMail-Markup: true
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary="Boundary-01=_XEEsShL4DytrHjy"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201312171318.31724.stephan.wagner@itos-gmbh.com>
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hallo Mike

I prefer 686-Kernel on a 32bit System, as it supports multiple cores.

Stephan


On Tuesday, 17. December 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> 
> Hi Anders,
> 
> On  Di 17 Dez 2013 11:23:31 CET, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote:
> 
> > Package: x2gothinclientmanagement
> > Version: 1.1.0.1
> >
> > I run my tftp/nfs server for my thin clients, on a 64-bit machine (a VM).
> > When I create a thinclient chroot with x2gothinclient_create, only the 486
> > kernel gets installed. I can use x2gothinclient_shell and use apt-get to
> > install linux-image-686, to get the 686 kernel installed. But upon doing
> > so, the reason for it not being auto installed is apparent: 64-bit 
machines
> > don't support PAE (not needed), and the deb package for linux-image-686
> > knows that this particular kernel is made for machines supporting PAE. I
> > can just say yes to the warnings, and I even though I end up with an 
error,
> > the kernel does get installed. This is not optimal.
> > I realize this is a problem (in this niche case, it probably "works as
> > intended") with Debian Wheezy, and not really a job for the developers of
> > x2go, but since I am running into this problem when using x2go, I am
> > reporting the problem here, and hopefully it will be sent upstream, if 
that
> > is desirable.
> 
> What is your reason for wanting to use the 686 kernel in the first  
> place. The reason I removed 686 support from the X2Go TCE is that it
> 
>    (a) did not bring any feelable improvements while my TCEs ran under  
> Debian squeeze _and_
>    (b) did not work fluently if the PXE server machine is a amd64 system
> 
> Please enlight me, why 686 would be a sensible kernel alternative to  
> use here...



-- 
__________________________________________________
Dr. Stephan Wagner
ITos GmbH
Bitzi-Bendel 2555
9642 Ebnat-Kappel
Tel: +41 (0)71 990 05 94
mailto:swagner@itos-gmbh.com
http://www.itos-gmbh.com
--------------------------------------------------
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


X2Go Developers <owner@bugs.x2go.org>. Last modified: Mon May 29 02:36:25 2023; Machine Name: ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de

X2Go Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.