From unknown Sat Apr 18 09:11:13 2026 X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Bug#375: x2gothinclient does not install 686 kernel Reply-To: Mike Gabriel , 375@bugs.x2go.org Resent-From: Mike Gabriel Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.berlios.de Resent-CC: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 375 X-X2Go-PR-Package: x2gothinclientmanagement X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 375-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B375.138727947217675 (code B ref 375); Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 375) by bugs.x2go.org; 17 Dec 2013 11:24:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from freya.das-netzwerkteam.de (freya.das-netzwerkteam.de [88.198.48.199]) by ymir (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6E25DB16 for <375@bugs.x2go.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:24:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de [78.46.204.98]) by freya.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C699CF0; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:24:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A58A3C04E; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:24:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XeifF0wPXELQ; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:24:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D40E3C04C; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 12:24:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from nocatv2.tng.de (nocatv2.tng.de [213.178.75.58]) by mail.das-netzwerkteam.de (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:24:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:24:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20131217112430.Horde.LR9FJpJqwhCoWPI1HhdULA7@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> From: Mike Gabriel To: Anders Bruun Olsen , 375@bugs.x2go.org References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.4) Accept-Language: en,de Organization: DAS-NETZWERKTEAM X-Originating-IP: 213.178.75.58 X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:23.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/23.0 Iceweasel/23.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_xm-01GpAVHfLveVUETfQSA5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_xm-01GpAVHfLveVUETfQSA5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Anders, On Di 17 Dez 2013 11:23:31 CET, Anders Bruun Olsen wrote: > Package: x2gothinclientmanagement > Version: 1.1.0.1 > > I run my tftp/nfs server for my thin clients, on a 64-bit machine (a VM). > When I create a thinclient chroot with x2gothinclient_create, only the 486 > kernel gets installed. I can use x2gothinclient_shell and use apt-get to > install linux-image-686, to get the 686 kernel installed. But upon doing > so, the reason for it not being auto installed is apparent: 64-bit machines > don't support PAE (not needed), and the deb package for linux-image-686 > knows that this particular kernel is made for machines supporting PAE. I > can just say yes to the warnings, and I even though I end up with an error, > the kernel does get installed. This is not optimal. > I realize this is a problem (in this niche case, it probably "works as > intended") with Debian Wheezy, and not really a job for the developers of > x2go, but since I am running into this problem when using x2go, I am > reporting the problem here, and hopefully it will be sent upstream, if that > is desirable. What is your reason for wanting to use the 686 kernel in the first place. The reason I removed 686 support from the X2Go TCE is that it (a) did not bring any feelable improvements while my TCEs ran under Debian squeeze _and_ (b) did not work fluently if the PXE server machine is a amd64 system Please enlight me, why 686 would be a sensible kernel alternative to use here... Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb --=_xm-01GpAVHfLveVUETfQSA5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJSsDRuAAoJEJr0azAldxsxMzQP/2LL3qWB1jGbPR03+KPaGsjo MlG40cqxdcYn4tLPPBsr80y/g8YEKa4YGl4Dp61zVLOt9++HynG2oK6OOdoy1Cha 3RdoCW9U/M7TKr20Q2qi+/hWGGbeLpmSy63yI3tY8BStWIF3j//WSQrhBthV+Epu 2maIvNw1O2wSQtsKclH4I30cuYi4BWpB73p+FG1Vd+UuIPNlIlRjw9WsQbRN9Ion DMbHmSsM2jDKZWpJnaoIPz3Ivkzc8frejYRyZMAX68lPdPUKn3f/FMhU8McFqBw9 WB8R9gCYA0KUcltWfIzPug3yRMWliCdVqTMptA/KvVTRasuTlwY7ThVnX4YnYEJd n0cZzc51Ag9G5pB/nnzIPosV5A2PJTtZwG/N08pp1WddUp8HkDlednoQVfAKbIE+ nUftleoWfBF7S6j6rD8u7G+cEtx0sPC1X7PsNzHmkdVP+Bnc/W88efLLVhmVaO1+ x9Y1sWvyJYXONwOZl5/Py3RD4pZPnRNAWKvqo5jS5NhEnFMo3IKmJILJnurJzZDO Ccg3TGXbVivk4PDb8/kXAA/xQ63XpB6B8qKU+SsHFXSWgzCHM36QxRjU9fkLtX6R 2IRy8I8OMZ59uYicKUk6Uhp5ypP+h1dLlqemmGbcssLpdjoc46w88QXe3QGAOgE8 RRP4PRO5pm44kGmkhSyd =YxP8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_xm-01GpAVHfLveVUETfQSA5--