From unknown Sat May 23 13:41:47 2026
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Subject: Bug#1344: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#1344: Bug#1344: Versioning in the launchpad ppa
Reply-To: Jens Reyer <jens.reyer@leberrohstoffe.com>, 1344@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-From: Jens Reyer <jens.reyer@leberrohstoffe.com>
Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org
Resent-CC: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org
X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:05:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.1344.B1344.154264346930276@bugs.x2go.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org
X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 1344
X-X2Go-PR-Package: launchpad.net
X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: not-a-bug
Received: via spool by 1344-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B1344.154264346930276
          (code B ref 1344); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:05:01 +0000
Received: (at 1344) by bugs.x2go.org; 19 Nov 2018 16:04:29 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE765DAED
	for <1344@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:04:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
Received: from ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id v7DNfYnrVfmH for <1344@bugs.x2go.org>;
	Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:04:16 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: delayed 925 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:04:15 CET
Received: from ares-mta1.core1.p4.net (ares-mta1.core1.p4.net [195.98.222.228])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E77825DA96
	for <1344@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:04:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ares-mda1.core1.p4.net ([195.98.222.164]) 
	by ares-mta1.core1.p4.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
	id 1gOln8-000cis-KX
	for 1344@bugs.x2go.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:48:50 +0100
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by ares-mda1.core1.p4.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
	id 1gOln7-0009W0-Tl
	for 1344@bugs.x2go.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:48:50 +0100
Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id o125so49283096qkf.3
        for <1344@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 07:48:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLgimeYO7dgb1RkiYvV2xr8nZPY2YCCbGnGSS2IlZmsdLDWG+ey
	P+Ohk7K35yCgyo+uX1cgkde+QGOaq7lgSm8SuQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5e3gpTdlhNk3xOt5hNHEwt9rQTxd7914mUYYGb09+HoRly0BGm0NvhVdjECaacurLWjlsteGG2be8a2SK4TS7E=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4cd7:: with SMTP id z206mr21644588qka.233.1542642528762;
 Mon, 19 Nov 2018 07:48:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKQJ+7RAA7Wb8Ri7ikVzm4gKCUWfduafb99LsjQCz8X5VLfwUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181119145934.Horde.OqfDBu8R8_8DWMHAqHSp8ur@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <CANVnVYKqd+WWRA1T6qMfjBE=rtbCZG-Xj_fL2L9ZwkNv2Fc3wA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANVnVYKqd+WWRA1T6qMfjBE=rtbCZG-Xj_fL2L9ZwkNv2Fc3wA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jens Reyer <jens.reyer@leberrohstoffe.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:48:37 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKQJ+7Tt_HJQpna-V9Hmwigjo=+No8xdmTAN-Kf3mvRfAyb2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKQJ+7Tt_HJQpna-V9Hmwigjo=+No8xdmTAN-Kf3mvRfAyb2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: 1344@bugs.x2go.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Ulrich Sibiller
<ulrich.sibiller@gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:05 PM Mike Gabriel
> <mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de> wrote:
> >
> > Control: close -1
> > Control: tags -1 not-a-bug
> > > $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/x2go-ppa
> > > Package: *
> > > Pin: release o=LP-PPA-x2go
> > > Pin-Priority: 1010
> >
> > This is exactly the way to do it.
> >
> > Closing this bug as a not-a-bug report.
>
> I don't really get it. What is the sense in adding a ppa to your
> system when you need additional steps to get the packages from there!?
> This is counter-intuitive! If a user adds the ppa he/she/it states
> his/her/its will to use packages from there, so why ignoring that user
> wish?

I basically agree with Uli, except that I'd only prefer newer versions
from the PPA over those from the Ubuntu archive (which should be the
case for nightly).
Or with other words: I assume you update the upstream source in the
orig.tar for the nightlies, then you should also change the upstream
version.
