X2Go Bug report logs - #1313
there is still a problem in getting a correct value for loadavgXX with loadchecker

Full log

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.x2go.org (full text, mbox, reply):

Received: (at submit) by bugs.x2go.org; 13 Aug 2018 10:40:16 +0000
From w.moghrabi@servicemagic.eu  Mon Aug 13 12:39:58 2018
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on
	ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EBE5DAEB
	for <submit@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:39:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de
Received: from ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id QqkBs4jkNaK6 for <submit@bugs.x2go.org>;
	Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: delayed 599 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:39:49 CEST
Received: from zm-01.servicemagic.eu (zm-01.servicemagic.eu [176.31.236.17])
	by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEF6A5DAE9
	for <submit@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:39:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by zm-01.servicemagic.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5116B807BF1BD
	for <submit@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:34:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) -
	zm-01.servicemagic.eu
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at servicemagic.eu
Received: from zm-01.servicemagic.eu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (zm-01.servicemagic.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 48Z1bUYN2xEi for <submit@bugs.x2go.org>;
	Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:34:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zm-01.servicemagic.eu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by zm-01.servicemagic.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82A5806980E2
	for <submit@bugs.x2go.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:34:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:34:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Walid MOGHRABI <w.moghrabi@servicemagic.eu>
To: submit@bugs.x2go.org
Message-ID: <1342096826.4000684.1534156440651.JavaMail.root@servicemagic.eu>
In-Reply-To: <883547417.4000531.1534156346103.JavaMail.root@servicemagic.eu>
Subject: there is still a problem in getting a correct value for loadavgXX
 with loadchecker
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [195.200.167.70]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.0_GA_2669 (ZimbraWebClient - GC68 (Linux)/7.2.0_GA_2669)

package: x2gobroker-agent 
version: 0.0.4.0-0~1038~ubuntu16.04.1
priority: bug

I don't have a "0" value anymore since latest fixes so the loadchecker process don't crash anymore but still, there is something strange.
Here is a fragment of my loadchecker logs from this morning.
Just to give you the context, I have 22 servers which are all automaticaly started at 6 AM (wake on lan) and they are absolutely the same (blade servers with same CPU, memory amount, bios version, ...).
I checked our monitoring to see if users were correctly distributed over the farm and at 7:30AM, I had about 7 or 8 users connected but 4 of them were on tce-server-21 where I should have had 1 user on 8 servers.
Here is the loadchecker log fragment :

root@tce-manager-01 [~] # grep -B 1 'loadavgXX:1;' /var/log/x2gobroker/loadchecker.log
...
2018-07-24 07:15:01,200 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:15:01,622 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23684; myMemAvail:23810; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:17:50,354 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:17:50,779 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23686; myMemAvail:23812; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:20:32,550 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:20:32,964 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23683; myMemAvail:23809; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:23:21,610 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:23:22,034 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23685; myMemAvail:23811; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:26:03,872 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:26:04,286 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23684; myMemAvail:23809; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:28:52,917 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:28:53,338 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23684; myMemAvail:23809; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:31:35,252 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:31:35,670 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23685; myMemAvail:23811; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 
--
2018-07-24 07:34:24,424 - loadchecker - INFO - Executing agent command on remote host tce-server-21 (10.50.0.221): sh -c '/usr/lib/x2go/x2gobroker-agent foo checkload'
2018-07-24 07:34:24,842 - loadchecker - INFO - Broker agent answered: OK; loadavgXX:1; memAvail:23683; myMemAvail:23809; numCPU:16; typeCPU:2400; 

As you can see, there is only 1 server with a loadavgXX = 1 (which means that in fact, we got a zero value from the broker agent).
This is not normal, at 7:34, there were 4 users already connected to this server and most of my other servers were empty.
Restarting x2gobroker-loadchecker service fixed the issue.
I think there is a problem in retrieving this informations ... even memAvail seem strange on this server to me ... with 4 connected users, it should have been lower than that.
I also think the number of connected users should be taken into account when calculating the load factor (maybe this is already the case, not sure about that).
---
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is private and confidential and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. It is for the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the author by replying to it and then destroy it. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail or any attachment. Thank you

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.