From unknown Tue May 19 06:17:37 2026 X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Subject: Bug#1012: [X2Go-Dev] Bug#1012: Session reconnect doesn't work (x2gobroker) Reply-To: Mike Gabriel , 1012@bugs.x2go.org Resent-From: Mike Gabriel Resent-To: x2go-dev@lists.x2go.org Resent-CC: X2Go Developers X-Loop: owner@bugs.x2go.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.x2go.org X-X2Go-PR-Message: followup 1012 X-X2Go-PR-Package: x2gobroker X-X2Go-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 1012-submit@bugs.x2go.org id=B1012.145872616318337 (code B ref 1012); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 1012) by bugs.x2go.org; 23 Mar 2016 09:42:43 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CEE5DAB9 for <1012@bugs.x2go.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de Received: from ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzHKNRY5oh17 for <1012@bugs.x2go.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from freya.das-netzwerkteam.de (freya.das-netzwerkteam.de [88.198.48.199]) by ymir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A075DA93 for <1012@bugs.x2go.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de [78.46.204.98]) by freya.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A8BDC9; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2B13C081; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de Received: from grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRpF1WF5BwdU; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from das-netzwerkteam.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimnir.das-netzwerkteam.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF3D13BA36; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from bifrost.das-netzwerkteam.de (bifrost.das-netzwerkteam.de [178.62.101.154]) by mail.das-netzwerkteam.de (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:42:28 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:42:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20160323094228.Horde.E8ayiECPO7JqLxstEtnkPxh@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> From: Mike Gabriel To: Stefan Baur Cc: 1012@bugs.x2go.org References: <20160322111457.Horde.Hg9FaccmAt5vBIUkY4EzXqq@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <56F24E54.7010603@baur-itcs.de> In-Reply-To: <56F24E54.7010603@baur-itcs.de> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Accept-Language: de,en Organization: DAS-NETZWERKTEAM X-Originating-IP: 178.62.101.154 X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0 Iceweasel/38.6.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_1_pE6aFK1CVDRZ3_G6vxRxP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 MIME-Version: 1.0 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_1_pE6aFK1CVDRZ3_G6vxRxP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, On Mi 23 M=C3=A4r 2016 09:05:40 CET, Stefan Baur wrote: > Am 22.03.2016 um 12:14 schrieb Mike Gabriel: >> Where do you actually have the X2Go Broker installed? On both X2Go >> Servers? This is a non-recommended setup. >> >> The recommended setup is: >> >> on broker machine, several X2Go Servers >> >> or >> >> two broker machines (with DNS round robin), several X2Go Servers > > What's the reason for this? > > Our idea was to install the broker on all X2Go Servers, and have one > Round-Robin-DNS entry for the broker connection, as well as separate > names for the servers themselves. > > broker.example.com -> 192.168.0.10, 192.168.0.20 #RRDNS > primarynode.example.com -> 192.168.0.10 > secondarynode.example.com -> 192.168.0.20 > > Is this still a bad idea, and if so, why? If you setup the complete broker <-> broker-agent functionality, the=20=20 broker=20becomes quite powerful. The software design should be safe=20=20 regarding=20privilege handling. However, I personally prefer to have the broker on a machine where=20=20 users=20won't get a login shell. It is just a gut feeling. In theory, it=20= =20 should=20be safe having the broker on X2Go Servers. But still... Mike --=20 DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike=20gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/mailxchange/kronolith/fb.php?u=3Dm.gabriel= %40das-netzwerkteam.de --=_1_pE6aFK1CVDRZ3_G6vxRxP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJW8mUEAAoJEJr0azAldxsxHFUP/0uNVpXqTwOE5/dpJVwKDyCO An3MpAEuwh5DJNYc8qlTbMFihIBeEho7TViQzpCQH+D5OBLnuG+KolWy8B7FpytP bzIqt+qsg6P5NRCYZVqbAZuJdJNf9ZVA+kU+DjD+d5bNRQ7o7Kwn6YsEHYMnBCE8 CkEcgfb++zwdLreMPX6WLeSnzYTwOmCUnaalzfFw3ZbrWO7y73z+04lcvm7jAip8 wxyOtltaBqgUfNO3bot0+Tb6wPTmcoKAbrobL0qEkAW31osxA+Z37ICwP2WCqECm SdjsrACP5NaA5sZcm0E+yf97WBvpcDB3bdgoweqsUCG18jhfTWKNt6Cm2HYmA1sT 2SIwVgAlCDXx8inqeAoRjfmOHwrV4z+Y7FOEdiTFXepTE1HbwvgzsgLqemvIPTIo U+eZ/3NVPJAapyUOb0nAHg2Er5KIK1TWd8e8q2+gACtxBH0ysNXmKef7P3B7CgS/ EQv2Qd/YE1MYBR0jcx8OBKocvKn/lwz321sS71OXCFoQ6CBRC7jcflrkz78huvZc q4SF/mm4VSYC2JX0tdvSwwSfOImDMm+laeXGtdk6fwT19O6tZoeMALbu8x1RFAGB yFX3xpYEr2twFS/8/uNus5c+uCcEbIdGOrMxO1oZE2fEB+6pdedBtR5bRP0ruaSX h/pzeogh5cxfuEIEi15q =Tw+i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_1_pE6aFK1CVDRZ3_G6vxRxP--