-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

* On 21.06.2014 10:26 pm, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Maybe the same patch is needed at that second position?

No. It's needed in two other places, actually. I totally didn't catch that, sorry.

Let me test the changes and I'll get back with an updated patch.


Mihai
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=18u1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----